Jurnal Ekonomi Islam

Journal Metrics of the Journal of Islamic Economics

The Journal of Islamic Economics is committed to demonstrating its scholarly impact and reach within the academic community, both nationally and internationally. To transparently assess and communicate its performance, the journal actively tracks and reports various journal metrics. These metrics provide valuable insights into the visibility, influence, and quality of the research published within its pages, reflecting its growing contribution to the field of Islamic economics.

Understanding journal metrics is crucial for authors seeking suitable publication venues, for librarians curating collections, and for institutions evaluating research output. While the Journal of Islamic Economics recognizes the limitations of relying solely on quantitative measures, it utilizes these metrics as indicators of engagement and influence.

Key metrics and indicators tracked by the Journal of Islamic Economics include:

1. Citation Metrics:

   • Total Citations: This fundamental metric reflects the overall number of times articles published in the Journal of Islamic Economics have been cited by other scholarly works. A higher number of citations indicates greater scholarly recognition and utility of the published research.
   • Citations per Article: This normalized metric provides an average number of citations received by each article, offering a clearer picture of the average impact of individual papers.
   • h-index (Journal Level): The h-index for a journal indicates that 'h' articles from that journal have each received at least 'h' citations. This metric combines both productivity and citation impact. The Journal of Islamic Economics aims to improve its h-index over time, signifying sustained quality and influence.

2. Indexing and Abstracting Visibility:

   • Number of Indexed Databases: The journal prioritizes inclusion in a wide array of reputable national and international databases. Metrics related to indexing include its presence in Google Scholar, DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), Crossref, Garuda (Garda Rujukan Digital), Sinta (Science and Technology Index), and other relevant discipline-specific databases (e.g., Islamicus, Moraref). The number and quality of these indexing services directly reflect the journal's discoverability and accessibility to a global readership.

3. Usage Statistics:

   • Article Downloads/Views: The journal closely monitors the number of times individual articles are downloaded or viewed from its online platform. High download/view counts indicate strong reader interest and engagement with the published content, even if not immediately translated into citations. These statistics are often available through the journal's platform or institutional repository.
   • Geographical Reach: Tracking the geographical distribution of readers and downloaders helps the journal understand its international reach and identify key regions of interest for Islamic economics research.

4. National Recognition and Ranking (Indonesia Specific):

   • Sinta Ranking: For journals based in Indonesia, the Sinta (Science and Technology Index) ranking is a crucial national metric. Sinta ranks Indonesian scientific journals based on their citation counts, publication regularity, and indexing in various databases. The Journal of Islamic Economics is committed to achieving and maintaining a high Sinta ranking (e.g., Sinta 2 or 3), which signifies its quality and importance within the Indonesian academic landscape. This ranking is vital for researchers in Indonesia, as it influences academic career progression and institutional accreditation.

5. Review Process Efficiency:

   • Average Time to First Decision: While not a direct "impact" metric, the average time from submission to the first editorial decision or peer-review decision is an important operational metric. A shorter turnaround time indicates an efficient peer-review process, which is attractive to authors.
   • Acceptance/Rejection Rate: This metric reflects the selectivity of the journal. A healthy rejection rate often indicates a rigorous peer-review process and high standards for publication.

The editorial team of the Journal of Islamic Economics regularly reviews these metrics to identify areas for improvement, enhance the journal's visibility, and further solidify its position as a leading publication in the field of Islamic economics. We are dedicated to transparently communicating our performance to the scholarly community.